FIGU Forum Q&A – Mu/FIGU论坛问答 – 穆

资讯源头:FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier

资讯主题:FIGU论坛问答 之 “Mu”
资讯来源:「FIGU Forum」
http://forum.figu.org/..(资讯链接随问题注释)
内容中译:利昂小子
中译日期:2019年10月15日 – 16日
校译日期:2019年10月17日,周四
推送类型:中文域-[中译]
资讯备注:这是一篇非正式且未经授权的中译版资讯,内容基于英文源版译制,请注意我们的译文可能存在错误。
资讯注释:FIGU论坛上的回复不一定都是Billy本人做出的,也有可能是经由「Semjase Silver Star Center/Semjase银星中心」的核心小组成员转达Billy的意思;又或依据Billy的教导和解释做出的说明。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Greetings Billy,
Billy,您好,

Is there any chance that you can go back in time with the Plejarans for us to get pictures of Atlantis, Mu, and Hyperborea?, and while you’re at it, perhaps rescue the real TJ before it was destroyed by fire?
您是否有机会和Plejarens一起回到过去,为我们拍一些「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」、「Mu/穆」,还有「Hyperborea/极北之地」的照片呢(?),还有,当您在现场的时候,您(为什么没)在…真正的「Talmud Jmmanuel」…被大火吞噬之前…救下它呢?

Just something to think about,
(我)只是在思考这些事,

James
James

Anwser:
来自FIGU的回复:

Hi James,
嗨,James,

The answer is no.
答案是否定的。-[注]

利昂注释:

这里的意思是,Billy没有这样的机会,和Plejaren一起回到「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」、「Mu/穆」,还有「Hyperborea/极北之地」所处的时代拍摄照片。

Regarding the TJ:
至于「Talmud Jmmanuel」:

If an object has been destroyed it is absolutely impossible to travel back into the past to ‘rescue’ the object prior to its destruction.
如果一个物体已经被摧毁了,那…(在它被摧毁之前,回到过去以‘rescue/救下’该物体),是绝对不可能的。

The only possible thing would be to go back into the past and making photographs etc. of it.
唯一能做的就是回到过去,给它拍照等。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Greetings Billy,
Billy,您好,

Aside from my next question, I think it would be a good idea for the Plejarens to create in the fields of England next year, you’re salome peace symbol, since this in itself may draw the attention of many more people to FIGU’s mission and to the salome peace meditation.
除了我下面的问题之外,我在想Plejarens(如果)来年在「England/英格兰」的田间制造一个…您的Salome-‘peace symbol/和平标识’的话,将会是一个不错的主意,因为这件事本身可能会吸引更多的人去关注FIGU的使命…还有Salome-「Peace Meditation/和平冥想」。

However, now that crop formation season is over, I hope this idea is not to late.
不仅如此,(考虑到)现在作物成熟季节正在结束,我希望这个主意(要做的话)还不是太晚。

Just a suggestion.
只是一个建议。

OK my Question is:
好了,我的问题是:

What will happen to the ET like beings living underground in places like Mt Shasta and also yet others living in Agarta, in the event of a possible world war 3, if it happens?
如果发生一场可能的‘world war 3/第三次世界战争’,如果它发生了,那些居住在像是「Mt Shasta」地下的‘ET like beings/类外星人生命’,以及还有其他还生活在「Agarta」(地下城)的生命,会发生什么呢?

I’ve been thinking about the possibilities that even in these events, whether such underground dwellings would still be a safe place to be for such ET human beings since the Agartans survived by this means during the destruction of Mu.
我一直在思考…甚至是在这种情况下(即:三战爆发)…的可能性:对这些(曾经)凭借这种方式在「Mu/穆」被摧毁期间幸存下来的「Agartans」(即:「Agarta」地下城的居民)来说,这种‘underground dwellings/地下住宅’…对这类‘ET human beings/外星人类生命’…是否仍然是一个安全之所呢?

Unfortunately I do not see the possibilities of any such underground ET inhabitants accepting any surface dwellers for personal safety, but perhaps there are other places for people to go to, such as vacant ancient underground tunnels, under South America, etc.
遗憾的是,我看不到任何…(这类‘underground ET inhabitants/地下外星居民’…会为了个人安全…而接受任何‘surface dwellers/地表居民’)…的可能性,但或许,人类还有其它可以去的地方,比如:「South America/南美洲」地下空旷的‘ancient underground tunnels/古代地下隧道’等。

Peace in new ideas,
(愿)和平在新想法中(萌生),

James Truthseeker
James

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

They will die independently if there is a war or none.
无论有没有战争,他们都只会独立(生存)。

(Btw: There are only a few of them living today).
(顺便说一句:他们中仅有几个人还生活在今天)。

If WW 3 should occur, you could die anyplace on earth, on the surface or in a tunnel…
如果‘WW 3/第三次世界战争’发生的话,你有可能死在「Earth/地球」的任何地方,在地表又或是在隧道里…

Note CF:
来自Christian Frehner的注释:

especially tunnels in earthquake-prone territories; besides, living in tunnels is not too comfortable.
尤其是在‘earthquake-prone territories/地震多发区的隧道’里;此外,生活在隧道里也并不是很舒服。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

What was the reason for the battle between Atlantis and Mu?
「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」之间的战争起因是什么?

Spaceman
Spaceman

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Power struggles and hatred.
权力斗争和仇恨。-[注]

利昂注释:

这里需要说明的是,「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」之间最初并没有仇恨,在相当长的一段时期里,这两个当时的国家彼此间相安共存。直到「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」率部重返「Earth/地球」之后,其势力在接下来的几百年中不断地在「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」的最高管理层中酝酿后两者针对彼此的仇恨,直至最终引爆了这两个国家最后的一场战争。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

I know I am asking a question with four parts, but I wanted to include it in ONE question.
我知道我正在问的这个问题包含了四个部分,但我(其实)是想把它融汇在一个问题中的。

Was there ever a kingdom, south the peninsula of India as the Tamil (South Indian state) Epic claims; extending to Madagascar and Malaysia? If yes, please answer, the following:
是否曾经存在过一个王国,像「Tamil Epic/泰米尔史诗」(「Tamil Epic/泰米尔」:‘South Indian state/南印度邦’)所宣称的那样,位于「India/印度」半岛的南端;一直延伸到「Madagascar/马达加斯加」还有「Malaysia/马来西亚」?
如果有的话,请回答如下(问题):

1. Who ruled it (first ruler)?
1、谁在统治这个王国(首任统治者是谁)?

2. For how was it ruled long?
2、统治了多久?

3. Did it have relations with Atlantis or Mu?
3、它与「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」或者「Mu/穆」有什么关系吗?

4. What happened to it, finally?
4、它发生了什么,最终?

If no, then how are there accounts of such a land in the Tamil Epics?
如果没有的话,那在「Tamil Epics/泰米尔史诗」中…怎么会记录(有)这块大陆呢?

Spaceman
Spaceman

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Billy doesn’t know.
Billy不知道。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Billy,
亲爱的Billy,

I have a copy of P-p Kontaktberichte Block 2.
我有一份‘P-p Kontaktberichte Block 2/Plejaren接触报告‧第二卷’的拷贝。

In C60/96 Semjase states that Atlantis was destroyed
在「Contact Report/接触报告」-060#的第96句陈述中,Semjase说到:「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」被摧毁于…

‘9498 Jahre, vor der heutigen Erdenzeit zurückgerechnet’
“ 9498 Jahre, vor der heutigen Erdenzeit zurückgerechnet/从如今的「Earth/地球」时间…向前推算的…9498年前”

and in C61/30 she says
…在「Contact Report/接触报告」-061#的第30句陈述中,她又说道…

‘Dies war vor 9498 Jahren v. Chr’.
“ Dies war vor 9498 Jahren v. Chr./这是发生在公元前9498年前的事情了。”

Also you state in C60 that Otto Muck had calculated that Atlantis was destroyed on the 6th June 8498 v. Chr.
另外,您在「Contact Report/接触报告」-060#中有提到:「Otto Muck」已经算出「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」被摧毁于公元前8498年06月06日。

So from what Semjase says in these two contacts it is clear that Atlantis was destroyed in 9,498 BCE(before the christian era).
所以,从Semjase在这两次接触中所说的(推断),很明显「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」是在公元前9498年(基督教时代之前)被摧毁的。

However this is contradicted in C70/136 where Semjase states that Arus XI was murdered by Jehavon about 100,000 years after Atlantis was destroyed.
然而,这又与「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#的第136句表述相矛盾,其中Semjase(在这次接触中)说到:在「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」被摧毁的大约100,000年以后,「Arus XI/阿鲁斯十一世」被「Jehavon」所谋杀。

My question is:
我的问题是:

Was Atlantis destroyed in 109,498 BCE?
「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」是在公元前109,498年被摧毁的吗?

Regards and Thanks,
祝好,感谢,

Charles.
Charles

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Thank you for your attentiveness.
感谢你的专注。

Thanks to your question we noticed that two commas are missing in C70/136, what brings about a different meaning.
正是由于你的问题,我们才注意到「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#的第136句表述少了两个逗号,而这(显然)带来了不同的含义。

The sentence must read like this:
(相关)语句必须这样来读:

‘… und rund ein Jahrhunderttausend, nach der Vernichtung von Mu und Atlantis, von seinem drittgeborenen Sohn Jehavon …’.
“…大约十万年后,在「Mu/穆」和「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」被摧毁之后,被他的第三个儿子「Jehavon」…”。

Atlantis was destroyed 9498 years BCE.
「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」是在公元前9498年被摧毁的。

When Semjase said
当Semjase说…

‘von der heutigen Erdenzeit zurückgerechnet’
“ 从如今的「Earth/地球」时间…向前推算”

she didn’t mean from today (January 6, 1977), but ‘before the beginning of today’s time system’ which started 2007 years ago.
…时,她并不是指从接触当天(1977年01月06日)-[注-A](向前)算起,而是‘从今天的时间体系开始之前’(向前)算起,也就是始于2007年前 -[注-B]

利昂注释:

注-A:这里指的是第七十次接触,发生在1977年01月06日(星期四,00:01);
注-B:本次Q&A发布于2007年,所以这里的意思是指公元元年,向前算起。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello Billy,
Billy,您好,

Thankyou for answering my last question regarding date inconsistencies.
感谢您回答我上一个关于…‘date inconsistencies/日期不一致’…的问题。

The teachings are more important as you said, but it is also of value to be able to place the sequence of historical events in correct order with dates which are reasonably accurate.
如您所说,「Teachings/教义」是尤为重要的,但它在…(使用相当精确的日期,将…历史事件的次序…置于一个正确的顺序)…方面,同样发挥着有用的价值。

Gaps of over 100,000y cause confusion:as in the case of
超过10万年的时间差…(确实)造成了困惑:就好像…

1)Arus I C70/124-133 (124,125-it seems that he arrived on Earth 113,000 years ago;and 133-until Mu and Atlantis could be destroyed….some centuries later) and the destruction of Atlantis and Mu 9,498 BC;
1)「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」,「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#第124句至第133句(第124句,第125句——他似乎是在113,000年前到达「Earth/地球」的;第133句——直到「Mu/穆」和「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」可能被摧毁的…数个世纪之后),以及「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」在公元前9498年的毁灭;

and 2)the destruction of Malona C70/76-92 (prior to 190,000ya), and also at the same time as the pyramid construction C155/73-75 (73,000ya).
还有2)「Malona/马洛纳」(行星)(在190,000年前)的毁灭,「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#第76句至第92句所述,以及在同一时期,「Pyramid/金字塔」(在73,000年前)的修建,「Contact Report/接触报告」-155#第73句至第75句所述。

The question that I would like to ask you is with respect to your book ‘Interplanetary Namen’.
我(这轮)想要问您的问题,与您的著作‘「Interplanetary Namen/行星际命名」’有关。

There are 7 factors to consider in the selection of a name for a child, so that the vibrations of the pronounced name is harmonious with the vibrationary level of the child as determined by the 7 factors-5 of which are based on the parents.
在为孩子挑选一个名字的时候…有‘7 factors/七个因素’需要去考量,由此,发音的名称的振动…能够与孩子(自身)的振动水平相谐调,这是由‘7 factors/七个因素’所决定的,而其中有五个是基于父母的。

Two factors concern the physical and psychological condition of the parents at the time of procreation and since these factors can change during the lifetime of a parent, then is this influence a genetic influence ( if so this would imply that our genes change with time)?
2个因素与父母生育期间的生理和心理状况有关,因为这些因素能够在父母的一生中发生变化,那么,这种影响是否是一种‘genetic influence/遗传性影响’呢(如果是的话,这就意味着…我们的「Genes/基因」会随着时间而发生改变)?

The other 3 parental factors are environmental influences (through the parents) it would seem, although they too can change during the lifetime of a parent-such as having a strict religious upbringing, but later on looking and searching for the truth.
另外3个‘parental factors/父母因素’看起来是‘environmental influences/环境性影响’(透过父母),尽管它们(即:这3个因素)同样能够在父母的一生中发生改变,比如:接受过严格的宗教教养,但后来又(致力于)寻找和探寻真相。

Regards and Best Wishes,
祝好,最良好的祝愿,

Charles.
Charles

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Yes, our genes can change with time.
是的,我们的「Genes/基因」会伴随时间而发生改变。

Genes are influenced by several factors, like e.g. thinking.
「Genes/基因」受几个因素的影响,像是…举例来说:‘thinking/思考’。

Therefore it is possible for a human being to overcome the religion disease heredity factors when the thoughts are turned to the true teachings etc.
因此,当一个「Human Being/人类」的‘thoughts/思想’转向真正的「Teachings/教义」等之时,这个人有可能克服宗教痼疾的‘heredity factors/遗传性因素’。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello Billy,
Billy,您好,

Thanks for your answer to my previous question regarding seeking the truth and it’s effects on our present and following lives.
感谢您回答我之前关于…(寻求真理,及其对我们当前和今后生活的影响)…的问题。

We are moving out of the age of belief and into the age of reason.
我们正在走出‘belief/信仰’的时代,而进入‘reason/理性’的时代。

The contact notes contain the truth, but, for example, in the case of Arus The Barbarian (Arus I) there are conflicting truths.
「Contact Notes/接触笔记」包含了真理,但是,例如,在‘「Arus The Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’(「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」)的案例中,(却)存在着自相矛盾的事实。

I have gathered the following information from my copies of the Contact Notes and OM.
我从我…‘「Contact Notes/接触笔记」’和「OM/真理之书」…的副本中,收集到了以下信息。

Dates are years ago (ya) from 1975 (C9), 1976 (C60), 1977 (C70).
日期(分别)是从1975年(第009次「Contact/接触」)、1976年(第060次「Contact/接触」)、1977年(第070次「Contact/接触」)开始的。

(1)Arrival on Earth of `Arus the Barbarian`(Arus I):
(1)‘「Arus the Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’(「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」)到达「Earth/地球」:

(a)C70/124,125:` Arus the Barbarian` arrived on Earth 113,000ya.
(a)「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#第124句、第125句:‘「Arus the Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’在113,000年前抵达「Earth/地球」。

(b)C9/138,139: `Arus the Barbarian` came to Earth 13,500ya.
(b)「Contact Report/接触报告」-009#第138句、第139句:‘「Arus the Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’在13,500年前来到「Earth/地球」。

(c)C60/42,43,44: JHWH Arus, the barbarian, came to Earth 103,000ya.
(c)「Contact Report/接触报告」-060#第42句、第43句、第44句:「JHWH/智慧之王」-「Arus/阿鲁斯」,野蛮人,在103,000年前来到「Earth/地球」。

(2)Adam:
(2)「Adam/亚当」:

(a)C9/144-157: Semjasa mated with an `Eva` producing a descendant Adam; the JHWH [`Arus the Barbarian`] did not know about this.
(a)「Contact Report/接触报告」-009#第144句至第157句:Semjasa与一名‘「Eva伊娃」’交配…生下了一名后代「Adam/亚当」;「JHWH/智慧之王」(`「Arus the Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」`)对此(却)一无所知。

(b)OM-C31/560: 1,700y before the first birth of Henok on Earth, Semjasa through his advice [of the JHWH -who is not named] produced Adam.
(b)「OM/真理之书」-「Contact Report/接触报告」-031#第560句:「Henok」在「Earth/地球」上首次诞生的1700年前,「Semjasa」透过他(一位未被命名的「JHWH/智慧之王」)的建议,生下了「Adam/亚当」。

(3)Destruction of Atlantis:
(3)「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」的毁灭:

(a)C60/50: After Arus arrived [103,000ya], world war for thousands of years and then Atlantis and Mu destroyed [C60/96: 9,498ya].
(a)「Contact Report/接触报告」-060#第50句:在「Arus/阿鲁斯」抵达(103,000年前)之后,世界战争持续了数千年,然后,「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」毁灭了(「Contact Report/接触报告」-060#第96句:9498年前)。

(b)C70/133: After Arus I arrived, war for 502y, Arus I old and weak, hate stirred up for several centuries and centuries later Atlantis and Mu destroyed.
(b)「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#第133句:在「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」抵达之后,战争持续了502年,「Arus I/阿鲁斯一世」(变得)年老体弱,仇恨激荡了几个世纪,在几个世纪之后,「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」被摧毁了。

(1)If `Arus The Barbarian` arrived 113,00ya, then he can’t also have arrived 13,500ya (and 103,00ya). Only one date can be correct, unless there are different people with the same name `Arus the Barbarian`!
(1)如果‘「Arus The Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’是在113,000年前抵达的,那他就不可能在13,500年前(还有103,000年前)抵达。
只能有一个日期是正确的,除非有不同的人在使用同一个名字‘「Arus the Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’!

(2)If we assume that OM is correct, then the statement in C9/144-153 that the JHWH did not know that Semjasa had produced a descendant Adam must be an error.
(2)如果我们假设:「OM/真理之书」是正确的,那么「Contact Report/接触报告」-009#第144至第153句中所陈述的…「JHWH/智慧之王」并不知道「Semjasa」生下了一名后代「Adam/亚当」…的说法,就一定是错误的。

(3)The time between the arrival of `Arus The Barbarian` and the destruction of Atlantis & Mu of a `few millenia` in C9 seems reasonable, but the `centuries` mentioned in C70 seems somewhat of an understatement when we are talking about over 100,000 years!
(3)在「Contact Report/接触报告」-009#中,从‘「Arus The Barbarian/野蛮人阿鲁斯」’抵达(「Earth/地球」)…到「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」还有「Mu/穆」被摧毁的…‘few millenia/几千年’的‘time/时间(跨度)’看起来是合理的,但当我们在谈论一段超过100,000年的时间跨度时,「Contact Report/接触报告」-070#中所提及的‘centuries/几个世纪’…又或多或少显得有些轻描淡写!

From the above we deduce that a number of these figures and statements appear to be incorrect.
从上述(内容),我们可以推断出:这些数字和陈述中…似乎有一些是不正确的。

One question is insufficient to clarify the above, but one question is-Who were the JHWH’s who arrived on Earth 13,500 years ago and 113,000ya?
一次提问(显然)不足以澄清上述(所有的)问题,但一个问题是:那个在13,500年前,还有113,000年前到达「Earth/地球」的「JHWH/智慧之王」,是谁呢?

It would be useful if a list of corrections was kept at the FIGU website, so that we can update our books-I have already suggested this by email to FIGU (Switz.) to whom I also emailed the above question, but since I have received no reply to date regarding the question, then I submit it here.
如果FIGU网站上能保留一份更正列表,将会是很有用的,这样我们就能(据此)更新我们的书籍——我已经通过email向FIGU(瑞士)建议了此事,同时我也将上述问题一并发了过去,但是,因为我迄今为止都没有收到关于这些问题的回复,所以,我就在这里提交了。

Regards and Thanks,
祝好还有感谢,

Charles.
Charles

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

There were several Arus’ involved, and they had vast spans of life.
有好几代「Arus/阿鲁斯」涉及其中,且他们都拥有宽广的生命跨度。

(Regarding identical names: the same applies to many families here on Earth when a son is named after his father, and his father’s father, etc.)
(至于‘identical names/同名’:在「Earth/地球」上有许多家庭存在相同的情况,比如,当孩子以他父亲的名字…又或是以他父亲的父亲的名字命名时,等等。)

Besides, all of this ‘number thing’ isn’t really of great interest and doesn’t bring us any substantial benefit, because it is the teaching that is important.
另外,所有这些‘number thing/数字事物’并不是很有价值,并不会给我们带来任何实质性的益处,因为「Teaching/教导」才是(最)重要的。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Billy
亲爱的Billy

I refer to Contact 60 where Semjase mentioned that Atlantis was destroyed in 9398 BCE, and this time frame was again confirmed by BEAM during a Q&A session.
我的问题涉及第060次「Contact/接触」,Semjase提到:「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」在公元前9398年被摧毁,且这一时间框架…在一次问答环节…得到了BEAM-[注] 的再次确认。

利昂注释:

这里的“BEAM”即是指:’Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier,也就是Billy本人。

Wendelle Stevens relayed in his book that Atlantis was established by IHWH Atlant some 33,000 years ago and it all went well for 18,000 years before it was destroyed.
「Wendelle Stevens」在他的书中转述道:「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」是在大约33,000年前…由「IHWH/智慧之王」-「Atlant/亚特兰大」创建的,并且在它被摧毁之前的18,000万年里…一切安好。

I consider that the above 33,000 years ago figure matched reasonably with the above 9398 BCE confirmed destruction date.
我认为:上述的数字‘33,000年前’,与上述确认的被摧毁日期‘公元前9398年’,合理匹配。

(33000 – 1977 – 18000 ~= 13023)
(33000 – 1977 – 18000 ≈ 13023)

However, in Contact 70, it was mentioned that Atlantis was established by IHWH Atlant some 133,000 years ago, an additional one hundred thousand years was inserted.
然而,在第070次「Contact/接触」中,又提到:「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」是由「IHWH/智慧之王」-「Atlant/亚特兰大」在大约133,000年前创建的,又多加了十万年。

It seems that Atlantis and Mu could not have been peaceful and prosperous for such a long time such as over 120,000 years.
(但)看起来…「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」和「Mu/穆」(似乎)并没有在这么长的、超过120,000年的一段时间里(一直)保持着和平和繁荣。

My question is:
我的问题是:

Could you confirm the approximate establishment date of Atlantis?
您能确认一下「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」大致的创建日期吗?

Or if there is any mistake in the figures within Contact 70?
又或者,第070次「Contact/接触」中…是否存在任何数字上的错误呢?

Salome
Salome

Savio
Savio

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

There have been 4 different ‘versions’ of Atlantis, not all of them existing at the same time:
「Atlantis/亚特兰蒂斯」有过4种不同的‘versions/版本’,(但)并非所有的版本都在同一时间存在:

The region of the so-called Troy, Santorin, Atlantic, and North Africa.
(在)所谓的「Troy/特洛伊」,「Santorin/圣托林」,「Atlantic/大西洋」和「North Africa/北非」区域。

©FIGU中文域

本篇为「FIGU中文域」原创撰文/译文,版权及原创资质,均完全归属于「FIGU中文域」所有,任何第三方平台或个人,不得以任何不正当目的转载、抄袭、拆分或是篡改该篇原创撰文/译文的文本内容及其链接和配图,以期维护FIGU资讯之权威和原创作/译者之权益,请予支持,违者必究。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s