FIGU Forum Q&A – Bisexual/FIGU论坛问答 – 双性恋

资讯源头:FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
资讯主题:FIGU论坛问答 之 “Bisexual”

资讯来源:「FIGU Forum」
http://forum.figu.org/..(资讯链接随问题注释)
内容中译:N/A
中译链接:「Facebook. BillyMeierChinese」
https://www.facebook.com/billymeierchinese/
内容校译:利昂小子
校译日期:2019年05月26日,周日
推送类型:中文域-[校译&中译]
资讯备注:这是一篇非正式且未经授权的中译版资讯,内容基于英文源版译制,请注意我们的译文可能存在错误。
资讯注释:FIGU论坛上的回复不一定都是Billy本人做出的,也有可能是经由「Semjase Silver Star Center/Semjase银星中心」的核心小组成员转达Billy的意思;又或依据Billy的教导和解释做出的说明。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello again Billy,
再次向您问好,Billy,

The Plejarens have said that women are naturally bisexual and two women are even capable of having children together, although such children will automatically be female.
Plejarens曾说过:「Women/女人们」天生是「Bisexual/双性恋」,两名「Women/女人(们)」甚至有能力在一起生孩子,尽管这些孩子也会自然而然地成为「Female/女性」。

Could you please explain how this is possible?
您能解释一下…这怎么可能吗?

Is this accomplished through some type of transfer of unseen spiritual forces or is an actual exchange of reproductive fluids required?
这是否是通过某种无形的‘spiritual forces/精神力量’的转移完成的呢(?),还是…这需要一种‘reproductive fluids/生殖液’的实际交换(…才能完成)?

Thanks,
谢谢,

Hunter
Hunter

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Logically the children will not ‘automatically be female’ of course, but male and female.
从逻辑上来讲,孩子们当然不会‘automatically be female/自然而然地成为女性’,而是(成为)「Male/男性」和「Female/女性」。

The process is not known to Billy.
Billy对这个进程并不知晓。

Besides, this is a very very rare happening that will occur when there is heavy danger that a population on a planet is on the brink of extinction.
另外,这是一种非常、非常罕见的现象,只有当某颗星球上的人口濒临灭绝边缘的严重危境之时,这种情况才会发生。

Note by CF:
来自Christian Frehner的注释:

A danger that is absolutely absent here on Earth, as the population will reach 7,300,000,000,000 human beings during the year 2005, which is nearly 14 times more than what should — according to calculations by the Plejaren — live on our blue planet in order to lead a life in abundance of all resources!
这种危境绝不会在「Earth/地球」这里缺席,因为到2005年,(「Earth/地球」)人口将达到73亿名「Human Beings/人类」,根据Plejaren的计算,这个数字几乎是…(生活在我们这颗蓝色「Planet/星球」上…原本可以过上一种资源富足生活的人口规模)…的14倍!


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello!
您好!

Presumably my rather extensive question differs radically from most other questions, but still it is imperative not only to me but to many others.
想必我(这个)相当宽泛的问题…会与绝大多数的其它问题…有本质上的不同,但对于我…还有许多其他人来说,这个问题仍然是紧迫的-[注]。

利昂注释:

这里的意思是,提问者迫切地想要知道答案。

Will the majority among human females remain emotionally and sexually dependant to human males in the far distant future or are the attraction-mechanisms towards males, among females, beginning to fade and disappear?
*在遥远的未来,‘human females/人类女性’中的绝大多数…仍会在‘emotionally情感(层面)’和‘sexually/▓(层面)’上保持对‘human males/人类男性’的依靠吗(?),还是,在「Females/女性」中,其针对「Males/男性」的‘attraction-mechanisms/吸引机制’…会开始消退和消失?

The reason for asking is because of all the articles from the media, scientific or not, that in some way or another shows an increasing amount of homosexualls among females.
提出这个问题,是因为所有来自媒体(无论是科学的,还是非科学的)的文章,都以某种方式或(以)另一种方式…表明「Females/女性」中的「homosexualls/同性恋者」数量在增多。

They are publishing the research in a way which makes it seem like it’s an evolutionary progress; perfectly natural .
他们正在以某种方式发布这项研究,使之看起来好像是一种完全自然的‘evolutionary progress/进化进程’。

Will there be a time when human males simply are not desired and needed anymore by human females which will be completely independant and only have sexual relations with other females for pleasure and with males only for reproducing?
(未来…)会不会出现这样一个时代,‘human females/人类女性’就是不再渴望和需要‘human males/人类男性’,从而变得完全独立,且只与其他「Females/女性」发生‘sexual relations/▓关系’以取悦彼此,而与「males/男性」的‘sexual relations/▓关系’…则只是为了繁衍后代?

The plejarens claimed all females are bisexual and this strenghten my thoughts about a world void of males.
Plejaren声称所有的「Females/女性」都是「Bisexual/双性恋」,这强化了我关于…‘a world void of males/一个男性空白世界’…的构想。

About the females among the plejarens related to my question at issue:
关于我在讨论中的问题,这与Plejarens中的「Females/女性」有关:

Are their love and attraction, as well as dependency to the opposite sex (males), just as strong or even stronger compared to the males’ love, attraction and dependency to females?
她们对异性(「Males/男性」)的「Love/爱」和「Attraction/吸引力」,以及「Dependency/依赖」,相较于(Plejarens)「Males/男性」对(Plejarens)「Females/女性」的「Love/爱」、「Attraction/吸引力」和「Dependency/依赖」,是否同样强烈…又或甚至是更强烈呢?

With regards,
向您致意,

Johnny
Johnny

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Your scenario will not become a reality.
你的设想不会成为一种‘reality/现实’。

Besides, there must be no dependency between man and woman, but Gleichwertigkeit (equality) and Gleichberechtigung (equal rights).
此外,「Man/男人」和「Woman/女人」之间不应存在「Dependency/依赖」,而只应有「Gleichwertigkeit/平等」(「Equality/平等」)和「Gleichberechtigung/平等的权利」(「Equal rights/平等的权利」)。

Note by CF:
来自Christian Frehner的注释:

As long as the human being needs a physical body to exist, there will be a majority who is heterosexually orientated.
只要「Human Being/人类」(仍)需要一个「Physical Body/物质肉身」以存在(于物质世界),那绝大多数人就定向地会成为「Heterosexually/异性恋者」。

The relationship between men and women in the Plejaren society (in a marriage) is based on true love, understanding and assistance.
在Plejaren社会(在一个婚姻)中,「Men/男人(们)」和「Women/女人(们)」之间的关系,是建立在「True Love/真爱」、「Understanding/理解」和「Assistance/互助」的之上的。

Here on Earth many couples are of the impression or belief that they feel real love for each other, while — in reality — it is only ‘Verliebtheit’, which is based on affective love, instead of effective love.
(但)在「Earth/地球」上,许多夫妻都有这样的印象或「Belief/信念」,即:他们彼此感受到了‘real love/真正的爱’,然而…实际上…这只是一种‘「Verliebtheit/迷恋」’,这种「Verliebtheit/迷恋」是基于‘affective love/情感的爱’,而不是‘effective love/有效的爱’-[注]。

利昂注释:

Christian此处提到的“effective love/有效的爱”,即是指「True Love/真爱」,后者与大多数人所理解的“real love/真正的爱”有很大的不同,不能将两者等同视之。

The information that women are bisexual does not mean that all women want to have sex with other women.
「Women/女人们」(天生)是「Bisexual/双性恋」的信息,并不意味着:所有的「Women女人(们)」都想和其他「Women/女人(们)」发生▓接触。

It means that it is potentially possible – and in extremely rare cases a reality — that a woman can have a fertilization without the sperm of a male, kind of a self-insemination.
这个信息的意思是:在极端罕见的情况下,达成某种‘reality/事实’的潜在可能性-[注],这种‘reality/事实’即是指:一个「Woman/女人」能够在没有「Male/男性」精子的情况下…自我受孕,就像是一种「Self-insemination/自我受精」。

利昂注释:

这里的意思是,某种“reality/事实”是有可能实现的。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hi Billy,
嗨,Billy,

Is anything wrong with a married couple {one man, one woman} inviting an unmarried woman of her own free consent, to have sex with them?
一对已婚的夫妇(一个「Man/男人」,一个「Woman/女人」),邀请一个基于其自由意愿的未婚「Woman/女人」,和他们发生▓接触,这有什么问题吗?

I am asking this one because I read it’s okay for women to be bisexual but if the man marries a bisexual woman and she is his only wife, then I am thinking they probably need to invite an unmarried woman to have sex which would fulfill the wife.
我之所以提出这个问题,是因为我读到了‘it’s okay for women to be bisexual/女人们是可以做双性恋的’,但如果「Man/男人」娶了一位「Bisexual/双性恋」的「Woman/女人」,而且后者是他唯一的妻子,那么我在想…他们有可能会需要邀请一位未婚的「Woman/女人」参与他们的▓生活,以此满足妻子的需求。

I don’t know because then it would be a threesome but it would have to be protected sex from which no child would result.
我不知道,因为届时…这将会是一场‘threesome/三人行’,但它又必须是被保护的「Sex/▓爱」,从中不会产生「Child/孩子」。

Again I haven’t tried this and I am asking to get all the details I am unsure about.
再次(声明),我从未尝试过这种事,我想提问…以获得所有我暂不确定的(有关这些事的)细节。

Thanks Moderators, Billy,
感谢版主,感谢Billy,

Earl.
Earl

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

As a rule, such a situation brings problems and even threatens or breaks a marriage.
通常来说,这样一种情况会带来麻烦,甚至是威胁…又或破坏一个婚姻。

Being bisexual doesn’t mean that you must have sex with both genders in order to be satisfied of fulfilled.
作为「Bisexual/双性恋」并不意味着:你必须要和两种性别的人发生▓接触…才能满足你的需求。

Besides, many women to not have bisexual interests.
此外,许多「Women/女人(们)」也确实没有「Bisexual/双性恋」的兴趣。

Note by CF:
来自Christian Frehner的注释:

Btw, inviting a person to have sex just for the sake of lust is not the correct way, because sex between persons should occur in a loving relationship.
顺便说一句,仅仅为了‘lust/▓欲’而邀请一个人发生▓接触…是不正确的做法,因为人与人之间的「Sex/▓爱」应该存在于一种‘loving relationship/恋爱的关系’之中。

FIGU中文域

本篇为「FIGU中文域」原创撰文/译文,版权及原创资质,均完全归属于「FIGU中文域」所有,任何第三方平台或个人,不得以任何不正当目的转载、抄袭、拆分或是篡改该篇原创撰文/译文的文本内容及其链接和配图,以期维护FIGU资讯之权威和原创作/译者之权益,请予支持,违者必究。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s