FIGU Forum Q&A – San Francisco/FIGU论坛问答 – 三藩市

资讯源头:FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
资讯主题:FIGU论坛问答 之 “San Francisco”

资讯来源:「FIGU Forum」
http://forum.figu.org/..(资讯链接随问题注释)
内容中译:N/A
中译链接:「Facebook. BillyMeierChinese」
https://www.facebook.com/billymeierchinese/
内容校译:利昂小子
校译日期:2019年05月19日,周日
推送类型:中文域-[校译&中译]
资讯备注:这是一篇非正式且未经授权的中译版资讯,内容基于英文源版译制,请注意我们的译文可能存在错误。
资讯注释:FIGU论坛上的回复不一定都是Billy本人做出的,也有可能是经由「Semjase Silver Star Center/Semjase银星中心」的核心小组成员转达Billy的意思;又或依据Billy的教导和解释做出的说明。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello Billy,
Billy,您好,

There has been conjecture on this discussion forum that WWIII will not begin until some time after the occurrence of the San Francisco earthquake you viewed in a time travel.
有人在这个讨论论坛上做过推测,推测在「San Francisco/三藩市」-「Earthquake/地震」(您在一次‘time travel/时空旅行’中察看到的)发生后的一段时间之前,‘WWIII/三战’将不会开启。

The logic is that the Transamerica building, which was split in half but still standing after the earthquake, would certainly not withstand the havoc that will undoubtedly be unleashed upon San Francisco during WWIII.
(这个推测的)逻辑是:在「Earthquake/地震」发生后,被分成两半但仍屹立不倒的「TransAmerica Building/泛美大厦」,肯定顶不住…毫无疑问会在‘WWIII/三战’中释放给「San Francisco/三藩市」的(「War/战争」)浩劫。-[注]

利昂注释:这里的意思是,如果新的战争在这场「Earthquake/地震」发生后不久就发生了,那在「Earthquake/地震」中已然遭受重创的「TransAmerica Building/泛美大厦」是决然顶不过去的,然而,Billy照片所示的…在「Earthquake/地震」发生一段时间之后的现场景象表明,新的战争并未在「Earthquake/地震」后随即到来。

Therefore, the war couldn’t possibly begin before the earthquake.
因此,「War/战争」(亦)不可能在「Earthquake/地震」发生前开启。

Is this logic regarding the timeline for WWIII correct?
有关‘WWIII/三战’-‘timeline/时间线’的这个逻辑,是否正确呢?

Jlo
Jlo

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Just as WWI and WWII did not destroy all cities on Earth, WWIII would not detroy all cities.
正如‘WWI/一战’和‘WWII/二战’都没有摧毁「Earth/地球」上的所有城市那样,‘WWIII/三战’也不会摧毁所有的城市。

In other words: WWIII could occur outside of San Francisco, and even before the great earhtquake.
换句话说:‘WWIII/三战’(也)可能发生在「San Francisco/三藩市」之外,甚至是发生在‘great earhtquake/大地震’之前。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Hello Billy:
Billy,您好:

I hope you and everyone in your family is doing well.
我希望您和您的每一位家人都安好。

The Henoch Prophecies state:
「The Henoch Prophecies/Henoch的预言」指出:

“即使是当「North American/北美」大陆将要遭受最可怕的、前所未有的‘catastrophe/灾难’之时,邪恶的军事力量(也)会造成‘havoc/浩劫’…”
‘Even when the North American continent will be stricken by the most terrible catastrophe which will ever have been recorded, evil military powers will wreak havoc…’

Is this most terrible catastrophe which ever will have been recorded referring to a future San Francisco earthquake?
这里所指的最可怕的、前所未有的灾难,是指未来的「San Francisco/三藩市」-「Earthquake/地震」吗?

Much appreciation for everything you and the people of the FIGU are doing for the betterment of all humanity
非常感谢您和FIGU人士为全人类福祉所做的一切。

Jo_jo
Jo_jo

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Again: this is a prophecy, and it can be altered.
再一次的:这是一个「Prophecy/预言」,它是可以改变的。

This depends on the thinking and behaviour of the people.
这取决于‘people/人们’的思想和行为。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Wise man,
亲爱的智者,

I am having great difficulty comprehending the idea of how YOU can see the future, as when you travelled with Samjase and saw the earthquake of San Francisco before it actually happened.
我很难理解…‘YOU/您’如何能看到未来…这一想法,像是您和Semjase一同旅行时,在事情实际发生之前…就看到了「San Francisco/三藩市」的「Earthquake/地震」。

Is the future already there, just waiting for humans to advance towards its direction?
未来是否已经定案,就只等「Humans/人类」朝着它的方向前进呢?

How can I grasp this concept when I live in the ‘present’?
当我活在‘present/当下’时,我该如何把握这个概念呢?

Does that mean that I can ask my spirit to change my own future?
这是否意味着:我可以请求我的「Spirit/灵(魂)」…改变我自己的未来?

Also I would like to take this opportunity to say to you, that I especially enjoy reading the material describing your interaction with Semjase, as written by W. Stevens in contact from the Pleiades, (thanks to Gaia Guys).
还有,我想要借此机会和您说,我特别喜欢阅读描述您与Semjaese互动的资料,像是「Wendelle Stevens」所著「Contact From The Pleiades」中所写的那样,(感谢Gaia Guys)。

In my mind, it creates a feeling of humanness and playfulness enveloped with a deep respect and caring for one another, specifically when Semjase is complimenting you on your philosophy etc. and you are asking her ‘Are you making me a proposal for marriage’?
在我心中,它创造了一种人性化和趣味性的情感,蕴含着(当事者)对彼此的深度尊重和关怀,特别是当Semjase在称赞您的人生哲学等时,还有当您在问她‘你是在向我求婚吗?’…时。

I can sense Earthly feelings from what we call today ‘normal’ human beings.
我能从…如今我们称之为‘normal/正常的’-「Human Beings/人类」…之中,感受到‘Earthly feelings/地球式的情感’。

Fascinating.
令人着迷。

Melli
Melli

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

You cannot ask your spirit to change your future (you can, but it’s of no use).
你不能要求你的「Spirit/灵(魄)」改变你的未来(你可以这么做,但这没什么用)。

You are shaping your future from one moment to the other.
从当前的每时每刻(…所做的每一件事情),你正在塑造你的未来。

To see the earthquake, Billy had to travel into the future (time travelling), where he could see it with his own material eyes.
为了看到那场「Earthquake/地震」,Billy必须穿越到未来(「Time Travelling/时空旅行」),在那里,他可以用他自己的物质眼睛看到它。

This process was undertaken with the aid of artificial, technical means (in a beamship).
这一过程是借助人工的技术手段(在一艘「Beamship/光船」内)进行的。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Billy or Christian,
亲爱的Billy或Christian,

Living in the San Francisco area, my question is about the Semjase photographs W. Stevens mentioned.
我住在「San Francisco/三藩市」地区,我的问题是关于…(「Wendelle Stevens」提到的…Semjase的照片)…的。

Is this a warning that we should change our thoughts to become more inline with the spiritual truths your message details, is this possible?
这是否是一种‘warning/警告’,警告我们应该改变我们的想法,从而变得与…您的信息中所详述的…‘spiritual truths/精神真理’更为相符,有这种可能吗?

Danke sehr,
非常感谢你,

Randy ô¿ô
Randy

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

This flight into the future was done because of Billy’s personal interest to see the effects of the earthquake and to take photos.
这次去往未来的飞行,是出于…Billy想要去看下「Earthquake/地震」的影响并(对现场情形)拍照的个人兴趣。

It’s not a warning.
并不是一种‘warning/警告’。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Billy, if you were to time travel to the future again, to the San Francisco earthquake for the second time with Quetzal then would you see buildings collapsing in the exact same manner, the same number of casualties and so forth?
Billy,如果您再次去往未来旅行,第二次和Quetzal一道去往「San Francisco/三藩市」的「Earthquake/地震」现场,您会看到建筑物以完全相同的方式倒塌(?),(看到)相同的伤亡人数…以及诸如此类的事情吗?

In other words, would you see the exact same scenario as you did the first time or would it be different?
换言之,您会看到与第一次完全相同的场景吗(?),还是会有所不同?

Joe
Joe

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Since it was a real travel into the future, everything would happen exactly the same way.
由于这是一次真正去往未来的旅行,(所以…)一切都会以完全一样的方式发生。

Logically!
在逻辑上来讲!


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Billy, regarding your trip into the future to the San Francisco earthquake; is this future event as you saw it, a done deal, a 100% certainty or can this event be avoided or the extent of damage, lessened by the course of our actions?
Billy,关于您去往未来亲历「San Francisco/三藩市」-「Earthquake/地震」(现场)的旅行;这一…正如您亲眼看到的…未来事件,是一个定数(?),100%会发生(?),还是,该事件能够通过我们的行动被避免…又或是将破坏的程度减轻呢?

Earthling
Earthling

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Of course this future event cannot be avoided or lessened in any way.
当然,这一未来事件无法以任何方式…被避免或是减轻。

It will happen exactly as Billy saw it during his trip into the future.
它会完全按照…Billy在他去往未来的旅行中所看到的那样…发生。

In other words:
换句话说:

It is 100% certain that San Francisco will experience a severe catastrophe!
可以100%肯定的是:「San Francisco/三藩市」将会经历一场严重的灾难!


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Billy and Christian:
亲爱的Billy和Christian:

First I wanted to thank you for opening the doors of your home, the SSSC for us; not only I had fun working and loved seeing such beautiful place, but I also enjoyed the company of great human beings and I learned a lot, which is the most important for me.
首先,我想要感谢您为我们打开了您家,还有「SSSC」的大门;我不仅工作地很愉快,并开心地看到了如此美丽的地方,而且,我还很享受与伟大的「Human Beings/人类」为伴,我学到了很多东西,这对我来说是最重要的。

I live 88 kilometers from San Francisco California and my city is at an elevation of 35 meters above the sea level.
我住在距离「California/加利福尼亚州」-「San Francisco/三藩市」88公里远的地方,我所在城市的海拔有35米高。

Lately I was thinking about the earthquake in San Francisco that will come in our near future.
近来,我一直在想…将要在我们不久的将来…发生在「San Francisco/三藩市」的那场「Earthquake/地震」。

I would like to move to a saver place and save my life and my family’s; however, my husband is not convinced of this information and he thinks that we should stay within this area because our jobs and our entire life is here.
我想要搬到一个安全的地方,拯救我和我家人的性命;但是,我的丈夫却并不相信这些信息,而且他认为我们就应该呆在这个地区,因为我们的工作和我们所有的生活都在这里。

I have tried to tell him that the San Andreas fault is around my city and that there will be a tsunami as well, so this area is extremely dangerous.
我曾试图告诉他…「San Andreas Fault/圣安德列斯断层」就围绕着我们所处的城市,而且在未来…这里还会有一场「Tsunami/海啸」,所以,这个地区是极其危险的。

Even if we survive, everything might be destroyed.
即使我们幸存了下来,一切(也)都有可能被毁了。

My question is, should I keep convincing him of the eminent disaster or at some should I part ways on my own and save my life and my daughter’s life?
我的问题是,我应该继续说服他相信这场重大的灾难,还是在某些情况下,我应该和他分道扬镳,从而挽救我自己和我女儿的性命?

I don’t want to get divorced or leave him, I want to save my life and in doing so my family’s life.
我不想离婚或是离开他,我只想拯救自己的性命,并以此拯救我家人的性命。

Very grateful, Marcela
非常感谢,Marcela

Salome
Salome

Marcela
Marcela

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

This is entirely your decision, because you have to live with the result.
这完全是…要由你自己来做…的决定,因为你必须(在余生)与相应的后果为伴。

Actually your husband must become reasonal by himself.
事实上,你的丈夫必须让自己变得理性。

This a private issue.
(但…)这是私人问题了。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Based on your prediction of a major earthquake in San Francisco sometime in the future, it seems US citizens do not have much of a reason to think WW3 or any major economic collapse will happen at least until after this earthquake takes place.
基于您有关「San Francisco/三藩市」将在未来的某个时候发生一场‘major earthquake/大地震’的「Prediction/预测」,(但…)看起来‘US citizens/美国的公民们’并没有太多理由去考虑‘WW3/三战’或是任何的‘major economic collapse/经济大萧条’会发生,至少在这场(「Prediction/预测」中的)「Earthquake/地震」发生之前…不会发生。

My reason for this conclusion is either of these events would most probably eliminate any chance for car makers to produce the type of mirrorless cars you saw in the future.
我得出这个结论的理由在于,这些事(即:‘WW3/三战’或‘major economic collapse/经济大萧条’)中的任何一件(发生),都极有可能使‘car makers/汽车制造商’失去生产…您在未来看到的…‘the type of mirrorless cars/那种无反光板型汽车’的机会。

Is my conclusion logical and do you agree with it?
我的结论合乎逻辑吗(?),您是否同意这种结论?

Door_knocker
Door_knocker

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

No, that’s not logical.
不,那并不合乎逻辑。

Btw: two times already the outbreak of WW3 has been prevented by Russian officers, luckily.
顺便说一句:幸运的是,‘Russian officers/俄罗斯的官员们’已经两次阻止了‘WW3/三战’的爆发。


Question:
论坛上的提问:

Billy,
Billy,

Is it possible that the car Wendelle Stevens saw in one of the photos you had taken from the future San Francisco earthquake is maybe a driverless car?
您在未来的「San Francisco/三藩市」发生「Earthquake/地震」时所拍摄的照片中,「Wendelle Stevens」在其中一张上看到了一辆汽车,这辆车是否有可能是一辆‘driverless car/无人驾驶汽车’呢?

Joe
Joe

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Billy doesn’t know.
Billy不清楚。

©FIGU中文域

本篇为「FIGU中文域」原创撰文/译文,版权及原创资质,均完全归属于「FIGU中文域」所有,任何第三方平台或个人,不得以任何不正当目的转载、抄袭、拆分或是篡改该篇原创撰文/译文的文本内容及其链接和配图,以期维护FIGU资讯之权威和原创作/译者之权益,请予支持,违者必究。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s