FIGU Forum Q&A/FIGU论坛问答 – PI (π)

资讯源头:FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
资讯主题:FIGU论坛问答 之 “PI (π)”

资讯参考:Plejadisch-plejarische Kontakberichte, Gespräche, Block 7, page 484.
资讯来源:
> 「FIGU Forum」
http://forum.figu.org/..(资讯链接随问题注释)
> 「Futureofmankind. James Moore」
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_251
http://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/Contact_Report_260
内容中译:N/A
中译链接:「Facebook. BillyMeierChinese」
https://www.facebook.com/billymeierchinese/
内容校译:利昂小子
校译日期:2019年04月09日,周二
推送类型:中文域-[校译]
资讯备注:这是一篇非正式且未经授权的中译版资讯,内容基于英文源版译制,请注意我们的译文可能存在错误。
资讯注释:FIGU论坛上的回复不一定都是Billy本人做出的,也有可能是经由「Semjase Silver Star Center/Semjase银星中心」的核心小组成员转达Billy的意思;又或依据Billy的教导和解释做出的说明。

Question:
论坛上的提问:

Dear Billy and Christian,
亲爱的Billy和Christian,

I have some questions about the following:
我有如下一些问题:

Contact Report 251 mentions an error in the Pi-number calculation:
「Contact Report/接触报告」-251#中提到过一个「Pi-number/Pi数值」的计算错误:

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
(…) These events coincide with many innovations and discoveries in technology and science; for 1995 and the ensuing years bring incredible breakthroughs that will change civilization. One contributing factor to these breakthroughs in the near future will be, finally, the exposure and rectification of an error in the Pi-number calculation. (…)
…这些事件与(人类在)科技和科学领域的诸多创新和发现…相一致;1995年及其随后的几年时间里,(这些事件还)将带来不可思议的突破,这些突破将会改变(人类)文明。在不久的将来,其中一个促成这些突破的因素,将会是,一个存在于「Pi-number/Pi数值」计算中的错误…最终被揭示和校正。…

In Contact Report 260 Billy and Ptaah speak about a calculation of the Pi-number from Guido:
在「Contact Report/接触报告」-260#中,Billy和Ptaah谈到了一个来自Guido的「Pi-number/Pi数值」的计算:

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
That’s exactly what we thought.
这正是我们的想法。

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
– Here, I now have a calculation for the circle number pi.
…这里,我有一个针对圆周率PI (π)的计算。

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
Guido’s work is the whole thing, as you can surely already tell by the handwriting.
整个计算都是Guido做的,你显然已经可以从这些字的字迹中看出来了。

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
The question, now, is whether the calculations agree and, thus, are accurate.
现在的问题是,你是否同意这个计算,也就是说,它们是否准确。

〄… FIGU论坛问答「FIGU Forum Q&A - PI (π)」_插图

Ptaah
105. This calculation is very amazing, but the time is still much too early in order to be allowed to make more detailed and more exact statements about that.
105. 这个计算非常令人惊叹,但距离…(我们)被允许在这方面做出更多细节和更为精确的说明…的时间,还早得很。

‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
We’ve already feared this answer, but we just wanted to try.
我们已经在忧心这个答案了,但我们还是想试试。-[注]

利昂注释:这里的意思是,Billy和其他FIGU成员已经预料到Ptaah很可能不会对此做出明确的回复,但他们还是想试着问一下这个问题。

Ptaah
106. Of course, I understand, but I really must remain with my statement.
106. 当然,我理解,但我真的必须坚持我(对此)的阐述。

107. If I would go into more detail about that, then I would have to violate our directives, but we don’t do such.
107. 如果我提及更多有关于此的细节的话,那我将不得不违反我们的指令,但我们不会做这种事。

Can you confirm the correct Pi-number is indeed 3.144605512… as suggested by this calculation, and where do the extremely precise values for the dimensions (base and height) of the Pyramid of Cheops Guido used for his calculation come from?
您能确认正确的「Pi-number/Pi数值」,就是这个计算…所暗示的3.144605512…(吗?)还有,Guido用于他计算的…「Pyramid of Cheops/胡夫金字塔」的极其精确的尺寸数值(基底和高度)…又是来自哪里呢?

Simon_cg
Simon_cg

Answer:
来自FIGU的回复:

Billy does not know since he did not get into more details during that contact.
Billy不知道,因为在那次接触期间,他并没有了解到更多的细节。

©FIGU中文域

本篇为「FIGU中文域」原创撰文/译文,版权及原创资质,均完全归属于「FIGU中文域」所有,任何第三方平台或个人,不得以任何不正当目的转载、抄袭、拆分或是篡改该篇原创撰文/译文的文本内容及其链接和配图,以期维护FIGU资讯之权威和原创作/译者之权益,请予支持,违者必究。

发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s