Asket的神秘照片

资讯源头：FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier
资讯主题：Asket的神秘照片

资讯作者：Rhal Zahi
撰文时间：2015年02月
资讯参考：N/A
资讯链接：｢Futureofmankind. James Moore｣
https://www.futureofmankind.co.uk/Billy_Meier/The_mysterious_photo_of_Asket
中版译者：Leon Fung
推送类型：中文域-[中译]
资讯备注：
这是一篇非正式的FIGU资讯（仅限英译本）。
这是一篇非正式且未经授权的中译版资讯，内容基于英文源版译制，请注意我们的译文可能存在错误。

Main conclusions
主要结论：

Figure 1 – Photo #110 purchased at the SSSC.
图1 – Rhal Zahi在SSSC买到的110#案例照片（SSSC出售版），基于从SSSC购买的照片扫描。

There are some aspects about the photo #110 on Billy Meier’s collection that make me conclude (and speculate):
针对Billy Meier照片辑中的110#案例照片（如下），我有如下一些结论（和推测）：

1. This picture might show the real Asket.
1. 这张照片所展示的人物，可能就是真实的Asket。

2. The pictures with the Greek columns on the background are from Dean Martin’s show (like picture #111)
2. 而那些背景带有‘Greek columns/希腊柱’的照片，则是出自Dean Martin的节目秀（如同：111#案例照片的情况）。

3. The way the picture #110 is presented in most of the books, and presenting it among the other (fake) pictures, help skeptics to keep his already established belief that these pictures are fake; all of them.
3. （然而…）110#案例照片在大多书籍中，以及在其它（伪造）照片中所呈现的方式，促使怀疑论者一再地保有其既定的…认为这些照片是伪造照片的…信念，（这涉及到）所有这些照片。

4. The negative of the picture #110 looks like it has been cut, or there is a mask on the photo that hides Nera face.
4. 110#案例照片的底片看起来像是被剪掉了，又或者，照片上有一个遮盖物，掩住了Nera的脸。

Please consider these findings, at this time, as speculations that have to be confirmed with Billy Meier directly.
请考虑这些发现，此时此刻，作为某种猜测，这些发现仍需要与Billy Meier当面确认。

They are not necessary the truth, but here I will present the facts I have found.
它们对真相而言并非是必须的，但接下来，我会拿出一些我发现的事实。

---

Asket or the Model?
是Asket…还是‘模特’?

The lady on picture #110 has a symmetric face.
110#案例照片中所展示的女性，有一张对称的脸型。

The model face is not symmetrical.
而‘模特’的脸型是不对称的。

They are not the same person.
（所以…）她们并不是同一个人。

You can do your own analysis and compare it to mine.
你（也）可以自己做一些分析，并和我的分析做比较。

Enhance the picture and draw a straight line joining the center of her eyes, and a straight line crossing the central axis of the face.
将画面增强，并画一条连接她双眼中心的直线，以及一条穿越她面部中轴线的直线。

Check the angle these lines make on picture #110 and on the face of the model.
（分别）检查这些直线在110#案例照片和‘模特’照片中…面部的角度。

Enhancing the brightness of these pictures helps to see clearer the eye.
提高这些照片的亮度，有助于使其眼部（细节）展示的更为清晰。

Figure 2 – Photo #110. The lady face is symmetrical. None of her eyes are higher than the other.
图2 – 110＃案例照片（SSSC出售版）。她的脸型是对称的。她的两只眼睛也处在与…面部中轴线垂直方向…相平行的位置。

Testing several photos of the model:
（如下是）对几张‘模特’照片的测试：

Figure 3 – Model symmetry (1)
图3 – 该‘模特’的对称性（1）

Figure 4 – Model symmetry (2)
图4 – 该‘模特’的对称性（2）

Figure 5 – Model symmetry (3)
图5 – 该‘模特’的对称性（3）

The model has her right eye higher than the left, by 3 to 4 degrees in angle.
这位‘模特’的右眼（相对位置）比左眼（相对位置）高出了3至4度。

The symmetry of the face is something that cannot be changed, as the hair style or the makeup.
（而）面部的对称性是无法改变的，这点不同于发型或容妆。

They are not the same woman, no matter the Model is very similar (or somebody wanted her to look very similar) to “Asket”.
（所以…）她们不是同一名女性，尽管这位‘模特’真的很像‘Asket’（又或者，是有人想要她看起来很像Asket）。

Since the Lady on picture #110 is not the same as the model of Dean Martin Show, is she Asket?
既然110#案例照片上的女性与「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」中的‘模特’不是同一个人，那她有可能是Asket吗？

The picture #110 shows this ET woman?
110#案例照片展示的是否就是这名外星女性呢？

It is very clear that other pictures, like #111, the ones that have the Greek columns background, show the model; just check the face symmetry.
显然，其它照片，如同111#案例照片的情况，也就是那些背景带有‘Greek columns/希腊柱’的照片，展示的就是这位‘模特’；只要查验一下她的面部对称性就可以了。

Mr “S” maybe gave Billy Meier fake photos, but why one of them (#110) is different?
摄影师‘S’-[注] 也许给了Billy Meier一些伪造的照片，但为什么其中之一的110#案例照片有所不同呢？

利昂注释：

摄影师‘S’，就是那个早期为Billy冲洗案例照片，但后来被「Men in Black/黑衣人」控制并背叛Billy的那个人。

---

What is the right orientation of the Photo #110?
110#案例照片的正确方位是什么呢？

The photo I bought at the SSSC (figure 1) has a different orientation as most of the images on books and in Internet.
我在SSSC购买的照片（图1，也就是110#案例照片），与书籍里和互联网上的绝大多数照片有着不同的方位。

In my photo #110, Nera (her hair) is at the left side on the photo.
在我的110#案例照片中，Nera（她的头发）位于照片的左侧。

But most of the photos (especially recent books or articles) shows Nera as located on the right side (only her hair is visible, not her face).
但绝大多数照片（尤其是近期的书籍或文章）则显示Nera位于右侧（只有她的头发可见，没有显示她的面部）。

See figure 6.
见图6：

Figure 6 – Common photo #110. Nera seems to be at the right side.
图6 – 常见的110#案例照片。Nera看上去是在右侧。

This is an example of an old article, showing an orientation of the photo #110 same as the photo I bought at the SSSC.
（如下）是一篇旧文章中的示例，显示了与我在SSSC购买的110#案例照片相同的方位。

Nera is not visible in this photo, but is the same orientation as my photo.
Nera并未在这张照片中显现，但这张照片确实与我的照片（所展示的）方位相同。

Figure 7 – An old article showing Asket´s orientation as my photo. Recent articles or photos on books show the opposite orientation.
图7 – 一篇旧文章中显示的…与我的照片方位相一致的…Asket的照片。近期的文章或是书籍中的照片，则展示了相反的方位。

So, which is the right orientation?
那么，（究竟）哪个方位才是正确的呢？

Is this important?
这重要吗？

I think it is.
我想是的。

In all the photos and videos from Dean Martin show, the lady that represents “Nera” is at the right side, not at the left side.
（因为）在所有「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」的照片和视频中，代表‘Nera’的女性就在右侧，而不是左侧。

So having the opposite orientation than the photo I bought at the SSSC, makes the photo #110 more similar to Dean Martin show images.
因此，也就是与我在SSSC购买的案例照片（所展示）的相反方位上，这使得110#案例照片与「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」的照片更为相似。

Not convinced yet?
还不够说服力？

See the comparison of the Lady on photo #110 with the model.
参见110#案例照片中的女性与‘模特’的比较。

Notice how similar they are in one orientation, but not on the other one.
注意：她们在同一个方位上，而不是在相反的方位上，这有多么相似。

If it is the same orientation of my photo, not only Nera would be on the opposite side but “Asket” would look different too.
如果与我的照片（所展示）的方位相同，则不仅Nera会出现在另一边，就连其中的‘Asket’看起来…也会有所不同。

Please note that since the Lady in picture #110 is symmetrical, it does not matter the orientation of the photo, it will be always symmetrical.
请注意：由于110#案例照片中的女性（的面容）是对称的，所以照片的方位并不重要，（因为）面容总是对称的。

Figure 8 – Different orientation of photo #110. Top row, both women are similar. Bottom row: they look different.
图8 – 110#案例照片的不同方位。上方：两名女性从这个方位上看起来非常相似。下方：她们在这个方位上看起来，就有所不同。

So which orientation is the right one?
那么，究竟哪个方位才是正确的呢？

I do not know.
我不知道。

But I know that using the orientation of the photo that I bought at the SSSC, shows Nera location at the left side, which is opposite to all of the Dean Martin show´s photos and videos.
但我知道，根据我在SSSC购买的案例照片的方位，显示Nera的位置是在左侧，这与所有「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」的照片和视频正相反。

It is done on purpose, having an opposite orientation, to make picture #110 similar to Dean Martin show models?
这么做显然是有意为之，通过使用相反的方位，从而使110#案例照片与「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」的‘模特’照片更相似？

Who did this?
又是谁做的呢？

I do not know.
我不知道。

I do not have evidence to answer these questions.
我尚没有证据来回答这些问题。

The fact is that one of the orientations favors the skeptics in their claims that this photo is from this show.
事实是，倾向于其中一种方位的怀疑论者，声称这张照片就是来自这个节目（即：「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」）的照片。

As in other aspects of Billy Meier´s case, the evidence presents an “exit door” that helps skeptics to scape easily from the idea that all of this is real.
如同在Billy Meier案例的其它方面里，该证据提供了一个‘exit door/出口’，从而帮助那些怀疑论者很容易地与…所有这一切都是真实的想法…失之交臂。

It is a gentle way to do a slow transition.
这是一种缓慢过渡的温和执行方式。

It is the same happening here with Asket´s picture?
这与发生在Asket照片上的事，一样吗？

On purpose?
（是）有人故意为之？

A coincidence?
（还是）仅仅只是一个巧合呢？

---

Is the negative of photo #110 cut?
110#案例照片的底片是否被裁剪了呢？

Scanning photo #110, the one I bought at the SSSC, and enhancing it, it looks that there is a missing section on the left side, just where Nera face must be.
扫描110#案例照片，也就是我在SSSC购买的那张照片，然后增强它，看上去在照片的左侧有一处缺失的部分，正好就在显示Nera面部的位置。

Was Nera or Semjase in this location?
那在这个位置上的，是Nera还是Semjase呢？

Billy Meier has already cut other negatives of pictures of a Plejaren woman holding a laser gun.
Billy Meier已经（/曾经）裁剪了其它某个手持激光枪的Plejaren女性的照片的底片。

Did Billy do the same here?
Billy是否也在这里做了同样的事情呢？

It might be a good question for him.
对他来说，这有可能是一个好问题。

Did Billy receive this photo with this portion already cut?
（又或…）在Billy收到这张照片时，照片上的这个部分就已经被裁剪掉了？

At this point we do not know, but the evidence shows there is a missing portion on photo #110, at the precise location of the face of the other woman close to Asket.
对此，我们一无所知，但证据表明：110#案例照片上确实有一个缺失的部分，正好就在展示…靠近Asket的另外一名女性的脸部…的位置。

If you have this photo, you may do the same, enhancing the photo and displaying the missing part.
如果你有这张照片，你可以做同样的事，将照片增强并展示那个缺失的部分。

See figure 9.
见图9：

Figure 9 – Enhanced photo #110. At the left there is a black area, hiding the face of the other woman (Nera?)
图9 – 增强的110#案例照片。照片左侧有一处阴影区，隐藏着另一名女性（Nera？）的面部。

Notice that the hair of the lady on the left looks black.
请注意：左侧那名女性的头发看起来是黑色的。

The model “representing” Nera has her hair brown.
而‘representing/代表’Nera的那名‘模特’的头发，却是棕色的。

What do I think about all of this?
我该如何看待这一切呢？

I think photo #110 shows Asket.
我想，110#案例照片所展示的就是Asket。

The orientation of the picture I bought at the SSSC is the right one.
（且）我在SSSC购买的照片所示的方位，是正确的。

I do not know if Billy cut the negative, but it does not surprise me to find that the evidence is presented in a way that it makes it easy to Skeptics to not feel themselves threatened.
我不知道Billy是否裁剪了底片，但当我发现（相关）证据是在以一种…能够使怀疑论者不易察觉自己受到威胁…的方式呈现出来的时候，我并不会感到惊讶。

It is clear to me the models of Dean Martin Show are not the same as photo #110.
我很清楚：「Dean Martin Show/迪恩·马丁秀」的两位‘模特’与110#案例照片中的（两名）女性是不同的人。

The photos with the Greek columns on the background that Billy received are from the show (like #111).
Billy收到的背景带有‘Greek columns/希腊柱’的照片，则是出自节目（如同：111#案例照片的情况）。

Somebody did it on purpose, by making these fake photos and through Mr “S” infiltrated them in Billy´s collection.
这是有人故意为之，通过制作这些伪造的照片，并透过‘S’先生将其渗透进Billy的照片辑中。

Rhal Zahi – February 2015.
Rhal Zahi，2015年02月

– Saalome Promise in 2023 –