微波爐的使用對人體是否會造成傷害?(摘錄自第260次接觸報告)

微波爐的使用對人體是否會造成傷害?
(摘錄自第260次接觸報告)

接觸時間:1998年2月3日,星期二,09時41分

接觸地點:Billy住所附近(瑞士鄉間)


中譯本註釋

重要提示

  • 這是一篇非正式但經授權的FIGU出版物。(註:限英譯版)
  • 這是一篇摘錄的中譯本。
  • 本篇譯文基於「德」 → 「英」 → 「中」 譯製。

注意

這篇翻譯由於德語及英/漢語之間無法解抉的語言差異而包含錯誤(因此與德文差異有可能會更大,敬請留意)。

在閱讀報告本文之前,請閱讀這必要的先抉條件資料,從而理解這份文件。


簡介

資料來源:FIGU/ ‘Billy’ Eduard Albert Meier

報告卷屬:Plejadisch-plejarische Kontakberichte, Gespräche, Block 7

頁碼範圍:462-503

接觸使者:Ptaah

資訊概要:這是一篇接觸報告的摘錄翻譯


英版譯者:Benjamin Stevens

英譯日期:2010年04月07日,星期三

校對改進:N/A

校對日期:N/A

英版連結:「Futureofmankind. James Moore Contact Report 260


中版譯者:James Hsu

中譯日期:2019年07月11日,星期四

分享網域:浩瀚宇宙之Billy Meier現象(痞客邦部落格)

資訊備註:這是一篇非正式且未經授權的中譯版資訊,內容基於英譯本翻譯,請注意我們的譯文可能存在錯誤。


中譯者摘要

這是在Billy61歲生日當天260次接觸部分內容摘要。在本次接觸中,Ptaah與Billy談論到許多重要的主題領域,篇幅極長且範圍涵蓋極廣
為使讀者閱讀方便,目前採用重點主題摘錄的方式,分項呈現,最終再合併為一篇完整的接觸報告,望讀者諒察。


Billy:

Thanks. Then here’s the next question. In the 238th Contact on 5/18/1991, we talked about the dangers of microwaves (see Pleiadian/Plejaren Contact Reports, Block 6, page 325 et seq.). Concerning this, I would like to read aloud the conversation that we had about it:

謝謝你。這裡接下來的問題是:在199年5月18日的238次接觸報告中,我們談到微波(見Plejaren接觸報告,第6節325頁及後續)的危險。關於這方面,我想大聲朗讀我們的對話:

Billy

You once told me that microwaves are very dangerous, which is why one shouldn’t cook with them, etc.…

你曾經告訴我,微波(microwaves)是非常危險的,這就是為什麼人們不應該用它來加熱食物等…

You then explained the following:

然後你作了以下解釋:


Ptaah

… but now, regarding microwaves, I’ll be happy to explain to you briefly that these are extremely dangerous for humans; they not only destroy the psyche of humans and animals and the life of plants in severe cases, but they also impair, such as in humans, their entire brain functions up to brain damage, whereby also cancer can appear, which is also already the case with the Earth people. Regarding the aluminum particle, it is to be said that aluminum particles taken in by humans are hazardous to them because they release, among other factors, the terrible Alzheimer’s disease. In terms of cancer, it is to be said that in the future, the microwave will increasingly appear as its cause, for microwaves are, unfortunately, becoming more and more heedlessly as well as irresponsibly used for all kinds of purposes.

… 但現在,關於微波,我很樂意向你簡要說明,這些對於人類來說是非常危險的;他們不僅摧毀了人類和動物的心理在嚴重的情況下,會危及植物的生命。對於人類來說,也是會有危害,人類的整個大腦功能會受到損傷,因而也會出現癌症,這也是地球人已經面臨的情況。關於鋁粒子,因為它的釋放會危害人類,在其他的因素影響下,還有可怕的老年癡呆症(Alzheimer’s disease;又名阿茨海默症)。對於癌症,應該是說,將來微波會越來越可能成為形成它的原因,因為不幸的是,微波已越來越多被草率而不負責任地用於所有各類的目的。

Cooking with microwaves destroys the vitamins and, at the same time, is to be specifically described as a great evil, this along with many other misuses. Even the eyesight of humans and animals is endangered by microwaves, and in the specific case, the cataract is to be mentioned, which can be caused by microwaves more and more. Different types of cancer, as I said, increasingly have microwaves as their cause, but in addition, simple and non-cancer-conditioned damages to cells will appear more frequently and cause many other evils.

用微波爐烹飪食物會破壞維生素,同時,與許多其他的誤用相較,這特別是一項禍害。甚至人類和動物的視力會因微波而受損,且在特定的情況下微波可能越來越會引起白內障(cataract)。正如我所說,不同類型的癌症越來越多是因微波而形成。此外,簡單和非癌症的情況也會損害細胞,且會更頻繁地出現,並造成許多其他的不幸。

Through microwaves, it frequently occurs that the fruit of pregnant women is harmed or even destroyed and becomes missing, and in this connection, the unknowing doctors aren’t able to determine the origin of this because they simply lack the necessary apparatuses and tools as well as the necessary knowledge. But that’s not enough, for the woman’s fertility is also endangered by the waves because it is very easily destroyed by these waves, as it is also the case that the man is robbed of his procreative power. On certain worlds that are well-known to us, it is common with the humans that women and men can be sterilized by microwaves, in order to counteract an overpopulation of the planets by the humans.

透過微波,經常發生懷孕婦女的胎兒受到傷害,或甚至造成流產。但在這方面,不知情的醫生不能確定這方面的原因,因為他們根本就缺乏診斷所必要的儀器和工具以及所需的知識。但這還不夠,因為女性的生育能力也會受到微波危害,因為它很容易受到這些微波的破壞。同樣男人也是如此,因為它會使他喪失生殖能力。在某些我們所熟知的一些星球,他們常用微波為婦女和男人來作絕育手術,如此可以防止那些行星的人口過剩(overpopulation)現象。


But I, for example, was advantageously subjected to microwave treatment, in order to get rid of nearly intolerable pains, to which I had fallen due to my knee osteoarthritis.

但例如,我患有膝關節骨關節炎(osteoarthritis;簡稱OA,或稱退化性關節炎),為了擺脫幾乎無法忍受的痛苦,我接受了微波有效地治療。

Then, you said the following:

然後,你說道以下內容:


Ptaah

Of course, because microwaves can, with reason, also have curative and progressive purposes and application possibilities, when they are brought to application with intellect and reason. On Earth, these things and the concerns about microwaves are not yet so well known by the people and especially by the scientists and researchers, etc. that they would be capable of fully handling these forces, which is why at present, and for the upcoming future, they cause more harm than successes achieved in the positive.

當然,微波也可以用於治療等進步的應用,在它提升到運用智慧和理性的領域。但在地球上,對微波這方面的關注還並不普遍,尤其是那些科學家和研究人員等,他們能夠充分處理這些能量,這也是為什麼目前和即將到來的未來,他們造成的傷害,超過正面成功的成就。


I then asked you further (241st Contact of 2/3/1992, see page 70 et seq.):

然後我進一步問你(在1992年2月3日的241次接觸報告,見第70頁及其後各頁):

Billy

Since we’re already talking about food: how does it actually behave in relation to food that is cooked with microwaves? Is there actually a certain danger for the person, apart from the harmfulness of the waves themselves on the human organism, etc.? …

既然我們已經在談論食物,那麼用微波烹飪的食物,實際的情況如何?除了微波本身對人體的有機體會造成傷害外,這種方式(使用微波爐)是否真的有一定的危險?…

Then, you gave me the following answer, which seems to contradict itself with your prior statements, since you said that cooking with microwaves is harmful. I assume that you probably expressed yourself too imprecisely for us Earth folk, which is why we probably misunderstand something. You said:

然後,你給了我以下的答案,這似乎與你之前的說法有所矛盾,因為你曾說用微波烹飪食物是有害的。我想你可能對我們表達了太不准確的說法,這也是我們可能造成誤解一些事情的原因。你說:


Ptaah

The use of microwaves for the preparation of food is safe, as a rule, if your question relates to the microwaves’ influence on the food and its consumption. The person can quite safely eat microwave-prepared foods. Only the microwaves themselves are dangerous, if the person is hit by these. Many microwave ovens shield the microwaves in no way, whereby humans – and even animals and plants – are hit by these and are damaged health-wise. Thus, the danger for humans, animals, and plants lies in the microwave radiation itself, which can lead to very harmful effects on all living organisms – apart from the fact that, for example, microwaves applied medically in the right dosage can very well be beneficial to health.

按理說,如果你的問題是關於微波對食品與其食用方面的影響,微波用於加熱食物是安全的。人們可以很安全地食用微波食品。只有微波本身是危險的,如果有人被微波直接打到就有傷害。許多微波爐被外殼遮罩住微波,那就沒有問題。由於人類 — 甚至動物和植物 — 受到微波的直接接觸會使健康受損。因此,對於人類、動物和植物來說,危險在於微波輻射的本身,也就是對所有活的有機體而言,可能會導致非常有害的影響。除此之外,例如在醫學上應用合適劑量的微波,是可以非常有助於健康的

[中譯者註:微波(Microwave)是指波長介於紅外線和無線電波之間的電磁波。微波的頻率範圍大約在 300MHz至300GHz之間。所對應的波長為1公尺至1mm之間。微波頻率比無線電波頻率高,通常也稱為「超高頻電磁波」。
微波基本性質通常呈現為穿透反射吸收三個特性。對於玻璃、塑料和瓷器,微波幾乎是穿越而不被吸收。對於水和食物等就會吸收微波而使自身發熱。而對金屬類東西,則會反射微波

電磁波譜

 

名字

波長

頻率 (Hz)

光子 能量 (eV)

帶寬
範圍

     

伽馬射線

小於 0.01 nm

多於 15 EHz

多於 62.1 keV

無窮

     

X射線

0.01 nm – 10 nm

30 EHz – 30 PHz

124 keV – 124 eV

3

     

紫外線

10 nm – 400 nm

30 PHz – 750 THz

124 eV – 3 eV

1.6

     

可見光

390 nm – 750 nm

770 THz – 400 THz

3.2 eV – 1.7 eV

0.3

     

紅外線

750 nm – 1 mm

400 THz – 300 GHz

1.7 eV – 1.24 meV

3.1

     

微波

1 mm – 1 meter

300 GHz – 300 MHz

1.24 meV – 1.24 µeV

3

     

無線電短波

1 m –100 m

300 MHz – 3 MHz

1.24 µeV – 12.4 feV

8

     

無線電中波

100 – 1000 m

3 MHz – 0.3 MHz

         

無線電長波

1 km- 100,000 km

           

微波可以用在加熱微波爐利用頻率為 2450 MHz(波長為 12.24cm)的微波對食物加熱

Microwave Oven-01

微波爐加熱的原理是利用水分子的電偶極(Electric dipole moment)在電場中會轉向電場的方向,當微波進來時,電場是來回變化,使得水分子為了要轉向電場方向而隨著電場轉動(每秒24.5億次的頻率),這樣的轉動即為熱量的來源。(資料來源:維基百科)]


First, you said that using microwaves to cook is harmful, but here, you said that cooking with these waves is not harmful. How should we understand this now?

第一,你之前說用微波爐烹飪是有害的,但在這裡,你說用微波烹調沒有害。我們現在應該怎樣理解這些說法?


Ptaah:

  1. It seems that I did, indeed, express myself unclearly at that time.

看來,我確實在當時自己表達的不清楚。

  1. The facts are as follows:

事實應該如下:

  1. Cooking with microwaves is actually extremely dangerous, but only in the sense when the food comes into direct contact with the microwaves, so thus, if the food is directly irradiated with microwaves.

用微波爐烹飪食物,其實是非常危險的。但只是在當食物進入直接接觸微波的狀況下,也就是如果食品直接以微波照射。

  1. Once this happens, transformation processes, which it also always concerns, take place in the food, through which partially poisonous and hazardous substances emerge, through which humans can be harmed in many different ways and, in fact, also are harmed, as I must rightly say.

一旦發生這種情況,它也總是與發生在食品的轉換過程有關,經由這個轉換,會使部分有毒、有害的物質出現,人類可能以許多不同的方式受到傷害,而我必須正確地說,事實上,這也是有害的。

  1. Due to the direct irradiation of food with microwaves, the cooking item succumbs to a transformation, through which health-hazardous substances develop.

由於食品用微波直接照射,烹飪的食物被迫轉型,經由這個程序,會產生對健康有害的物質

  1. But otherwise, this isn’t the case, and cooking with microwaves is totally harmless, if the ovens are constructed in such a way that they are only heated up by the microwaves, and indeed, from the outside; consequently, no waves can reach into the actual cooking item.

但是,另一方面,如果不是這樣,如果他們只是使用微波加熱的那種微波爐,而事實上是從外面;因此,沒有微波可以進入實際烹飪的食物,那麼用微波爐烹飪是完全無害的

  1. So for this, completely closed cooking containers are necessary, which don’t allow microwaves into the interior and into the cooking item.

因此,這種完全封閉烹飪的容器是必要的,而不允許微波進入內部和烹飪的食物

  1. The microwave oven itself must, of course, also be constructed in such a way that no waves can penetrate out of it, so that the surroundings or humans aren’t encountered by them. –

當然,微波爐本身的構造也必須使任何微波都無法穿透這樣周圍的環境或人就不會受到影響

  1. And since I’m already clarifying these issues, it would be appropriate that this is also done in relation to Alzheimer’s disease, so that it isn’t supposed that microwave radiation is the basic cause of this evil.

由於我已經在澄清這些問題,因此也應在阿茨海默症方面這樣做,這樣就不應該認為微波輻射是造成這種傷害的根本原因。

  1. It is certainly true that microwaves are only a small influencing factor in relation to Alzheimer’s disease, as this is also the case with aluminum particles.

當然,微波只是影響阿茨海默症的一個小因素,因為鋁粒子也是如此。

  1. Both are not direct causes or producers of the disease but merely factors that are contributory, under certain conditions, with the emergence of Alzheimer’s disease.

兩者都不是造成這種疾病的直接原因,而只是在某些條件下促成阿茨海默症出現的因素。

  1. With that, the facts should now actually be clear.

說到這裡,事實現在上應該實際是清楚了。

[中譯者註:上段敘述,實際還是讓人無法完全釐清;什麼是“當食物進入直接接觸微波的狀況下…由於食品用微波直接照射,烹飪的食物被迫轉型,經由這個程序,會產生對健康有害的物質。…如果他們只是使用微波加熱的那種微波爐,而事實上是從外面;因此,沒有微波可以進入實際烹飪的食物那麼用微波爐烹飪是完全無害的。”
但目前市售的微波爐,不都是使用微波直接照射食物(當然食物有適當的容器)然後加熱的嗎?(而微波爐本身也有適當的外殼隔絕微波)這到底算不算有害呢?
有關資訊,請參閱2018年3月18日刊出較有公信力(有參考依據權責單位資料)的文章 —— 《會致癌?有輻射?各種微波爐謠言一次破解
特從中摘要重點如下

一、微波爐的輻射不會致癌:微波輻射與會致癌的輻射是截然不同的東西。微波爐產生的輻射屬於非電離輻射,是電磁波的一種,介於無線電波與紅外線之間,所處的頻率跟常用的Wi-Fi一模一樣,都是2.45GHz。至於大家最害怕,最容易被偷換概念的那種輻射其實是電離輻射,像是伽馬射線,X射線等,能量與穿透性都高出微波非常多,波長都是奈米級別。

二、使用微波爐時的安全距離:勞動部勞動及職業安全衛生研究所建議為50公分,至於學理上的安全距離則為5公分。

三、食物用微波爐加熱不會特別造成營養的流失:所有加熱食物的行為都會導致營養流失,相比之下微波爐並沒有特別嚴重,在某些情況下甚至能保留較多營養。

四、微波加熱不會讓食物致癌但不能過分加熱:一些網路謠言認為,微波會導致食物產生致癌物質,這其實違反化學原理,微波並不會打斷化學鏈,也不會使元素衰變成放射性同位素。(特定的放射性同位素,在衰變過程中釋放出電離輻射,這些輻射才會破壞細胞與DNA,才有可能引發癌症。)
然而,當食物過度加熱導致燒焦的時候,就可能會產生致癌的物質,例如澱粉類在高溫下過度烹煮,會產生丙烯酰胺,碳水化合物與脂肪燒焦時則會產生多環芳香烴,這些致癌物質會傷害DNA,從而引發癌症。

五、微波爐對人體可能會造成燒傷或間接導致燙傷:若將人塞入密封的小空間內發射微波,因為是直接加熱,所以可能導致燒傷,在美國就曾發生一起案例,變態父母將小朋友放在微波爐內加熱,導致小孩二度燒傷。根據FDA收到的通報案例,絕大多數傷害都是由於過度加熱導致液體突沸,或者錯誤的加熱有殼雞蛋導致水蒸氣爆炸,間接讓人燙傷。

六、微波爐會引發白內障:一些案例研究認為,微波可能是誘發白內障的原因之一。由於眼睛特殊的脆弱結構,當受到高強度的微波時,會加熱水晶體內的水分子,而眼睛的構造使熱能難以排出,進而誘發白內障。故保險起見,美國FDA建議微波過程中請勿靠近觀看微波爐

七、有些食品不該放入微波爐加熱:1. 金屬(會反射微波,導致無法預期的傷害);2. 除了聚丙烯(PP;具有耐熱與化學穩定的特色)外的所有塑膠;3. 放太久與容易生長細菌的食物(殺菌不足);4. 帶殼雞蛋(會引發爆裂)…

網路上有一篇名為「請立即丟掉你的微波爐」的文章,從2004年開始出現在網路上,其間經過許多造謠者加油添醋,而文中研究人員的國籍,也從一開始只有美國人,後來增加蘇聯人,瑞典人以及各種白人等等,全都是捏造的。]

Billy:

Thanks; that really should be without misunderstanding. …

謝謝你,這樣真的應該不會有誤解了。…

(本篇接觸報告摘錄部分結束)


发表评论

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com 徽标

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  更改 )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  更改 )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  更改 )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  更改 )

Connecting to %s